the video is broken after the 11th minute for me, tried on FF and chrome.
stil l an interesting watc h, its a shame it was more a less just a yelling m atch ov er each other.
rebecca
|SAdministrator
|2010-08-05 09:07:08
Fixed now. Thanks for letting us know.
Jellybean
|60.228.21.xxx
|2010-08-18 16:26:38
Is there a way to read the entirety of the longer comments that aren't complete ly displayed?
JosH Brown
|121.214.180.xxx
|2010-08-05 14:39:03
Family first are stupid, how could people not supp ort gay marriage, it is the
only way our governme nt still discriminates against a particular group in our country
Inception
|123.243.87.xxx
|2010-08-06 13:22:47
I am sorry Wendy, but YOU are wrong!
You understa nd NOTHING about the internet filter. So Fiona its totally correct. There will be a blacklist. So yo u WILL NOT be able to choose what you want to view . So go do some further research so you know what you are actually talking about.
As for the gay ma rriage and cha nging the marriage act, why not? It is not the back bone of Australia! What are you ta lking about? So if marriage laws are changed, Aust ralia wi...
tinmancactus
|122.107.187.xxx
|2010-08-07 09:28:51
Wendy is so damn rude. Notice how she just cuts of f Fiona whenever she likes, w hereas Fiona waits fo r an opportunity to add her opinion. Wendy is goin g to ge t nowhere as a politician, she just wants t o bring christianity even moreso int o Australian p olitics.
timmy9110
|203.153.236.xxx
|2010-08-11 18:35:19
LMAO,
when Fiona goes:
"I agree with everythi ng, but...."
Wendy:
" ;AHHAHAAHAHHA no that 's not everything *giggle giggle* that's not every thing.. .
good comeback chubbs.....
Lee
- Charities
|122.57.242.xxx
|2010-08-11 01:12:26
Interesting comments on this discussion, and my th oughts (as a stay-at-home mar ried mother of two ve ry young children):
- Charities are NOT supporte d by ch urches. They are supported by dollars earne d by Australian families. Churches d o not pay for the charity work they occasionally do - their memb ers and donors are the ones who pay for the charit y. So the FF candidate is missing the point .
- A s a mother of a young family, I would much rather have ope...
Cerzel
|203.206.66.xxx
|2010-08-11 11:28:12
That was brilliant, Fiona. Way to show 'em. This i s the first time I've seen yo u speak, and it's lef t a pretty good impression.
timmy9110
- LMFAO
|203.153.236.xxx
|2010-08-11 18:31:57
you want to see something really funny
on the FF' s website, they claim that We ndy had clearly won t he debate
but, like this site, the FF also has a comment s page, and all the comments got removed fo r incredibly obvious reasons
a few quotes of Wend y - food for thought
"no no no, its not about Equality, its about the good of australia"
4;why change something that has been around for ev er"
"NO YOU"RE WRONG, YOU'RE WRONG!!!! "
Bapster
|60.242.96.xxx
|2010-08-12 07:50:58
Loved it.
Fiona got across all the important poi nts with poise and intelligen ce, while Wendy looke d childish and just flustered.
It actually amazed me how juvanile Wendy was throughout this debate. Glad to see the ASP winning the day and hopefully the respect and votes of viewers.
Antares_Nick
|124.169.56.xxx
|2010-08-12 09:41:56
Fiona - Congratulations!
Cool, calm and collected as opposed to the incompetent dribbling of the fam ily first turkey.
Chad__
|110.175.43.xxx
|2010-08-16 14:37:55
Normally I find debates so boring... that one how ever was fun!
I real ly don't want that Family First chick to like... win or wh atever it is. She seems like a real b***h.
I just wanna hug Fiona! She seems so nice and her view s are so good.
depcravenite
- Where babies come from
|124.148.234.xxx
|2010-08-17 08:40:46
If FF want to protect children, they have to reali se that those children exist because people had se x. So really, is sex such a bad thing?
Sex create s child ren.
Children are our future.
Sex is our fu ture.
It only seems logical.
Grinners
|138.217.117.xxx
|2010-08-17 14:56:44
Basing your vote on what genitals the party leader has is absurd.
You were p erfect until you stat ed that you would be voting for the prime
minist er sole ly because she is a woman...
That sadden s me, such an intelligent debate on your behalf wi th an unnecessary, sexist remark at the end.
Po sitive discrim ination is still discrimination.
Edit - Why does this comment board post the text a ll broken up like this...?
Jellybean
- Free Society?
|60.228.21.xxx
|2010-08-18 16:14:44
Apparently Wendy's definition of "a free socie ty" doesn't include freed om to marry who you w ant, freedom of speech/expressing ideas or freedom from g overnment censorship (eg. internet blacklis ting, billboards, etc). HER definiti on of "a f ree society" means keeping religion tax exempt ..? Um...
As f or "why change something that ha s been around forever?" in relation to allowin g gays to marry, the answer to that, as Fiona said , is EQU...
blackadder
- nutter
|60.241.239.xxx
|2010-08-21 14:25:02
'talk more about devaluing humans lives thats what your saying'
wtf?! shes an absolute idiot, how i s voluntary euthanasia devaluing humans lives?
ku dos to fiona for staying calm and collective, i wo uld have smacked the bitch
Heather knows good sex
|121.216.1.xxx
|2010-08-23 04:50:43
wow the family first party is a bunch of closemind ed fools,she was getting so f lustered.her only deb ating tatic was to cut fiona off with'no, no ,no , not tru e" well done wendy you have proven how little you really know about modern australians.
love you fiona
!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."
Authorised by Robert Swan, 10 Ipswich Street, Fyshwick ACT 2609.
